I just wouldn't necessarily expect to be able to edit them in version 1. Since they say that you can however, that has to mean that any existing effects and metadata will be intact. Put those together, and it tell us that just because you can migrate, doesn't necessarily mean that you should. They have also stated that there will be at least one maintenance release to ensure that Aperture is fully compatible with OS X Yosemite. Apple has stated that users will be able to migrate their existing libraries. Will Photos.app version 1 have all the features of Aperture 3?

I cannot find the email I received from Apple to announce the end of Aperture, but it said basically, what has been published here: psi Unfortunately, Apple never promised that. We seem to be overlooking that this new photos app was alleged to replace aperture. It was stupid and likely a designer that's not dealt with real shoots that thoughit this could replace aperture or even iPhoto. So now, my photos have less information than standard. It's also hassle.ģ) the star ratings are industry accepted. it takes more clicks, more orientation for each rating. The photos app is clunky and takes too long to do this. When you shoot 1000 photos, it saves time.Ģ) quickly sorting a 1500 frame album was so much faster because it took one click right next to the photo. There are three misses: 1) I rate a lot of photos on scene right on the camera - it makes using a smart folder to find them easier. Check out the Keyword Manager - just like iPhoto's. You can even assign the same keyboard shortcut to the keywords as you used in iPhoto. What's the miss? A rating and a keyword a functionally the same thing, with the added benefit that you can export keywords (as there is a standard for those) but not ratings.

Photo supreme vs lightroom smart albums